搜索图标
搜索

热门搜索:如何备考GRE GRE填空 GRE数学机经 GRE模考

CHP36套 -245【medium】 00:00:00 关闭计时
收藏
纠错

Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as revolutionary, flying in the face of what is established and producing not what is acceptable but what will become accepted. According to this formulation, highly creative activity transcends the limits of an existing form and establishes a new principle of organization. However, the idea that extraordinary creativity transcends established limits is misleading when it is applied to the arts, even though it may be valid for the sciences. Difference between highly creative art and highly creative science arise in part from a difference in their goals. For the sciences, a new theory is the goal and end result of the creative act. Innovative science produces new propositions in terms of which diverse phenomena can be related to one another in more coherent ways. Such phenomena as a brilliant diamond or a nesting bird are relegated to the role of data, serving as the means for formulating or testing a new theory. The goal of highly creative art is very different: the phenomenon itself becomes the direct product of the creative act. Shakespeare`s Hamlet is not a tract about the behavior of indecisive princes or the uses of political power; nor is Picasso`s painting Guernica primarily a propositional statement about the Spanish Civil War or the evils of fascism. What highly creative artistic activity produces is not a new generalization that transcends established limits, but rather an aesthetic particular. Aesthetic particulars produced by the highly creative artist extend or exploit, in an innovative way, the limits of an existing form, rather than transcend that form. 

This is not to deny that a highly creative artist sometimes establishes a new principle of organization in the history of an artistic field; the composer Monteverdi, who created music of the highest aesthetic value, comes to mind. More generally, however, whether or not a composition establishes a new principle in the history of music has little bearing on its aesthetic worth. Because they embody a new principle of organization, some musical works, such as the operas of the Florentine Camerata, are of signal historical importance, but few listeners or musicologists would include these among the great works of music. On the other hand, Mozart`s The Marriage of Figaro is surely among the masterpieces of music even though its modest innovations are confined to extending existing means. It has been said of Beethoven that he toppled the rules and freed music from the stifling confines of convention. But a close study of his compositions reveals that Beethoven overturned no fundamental rules. Rather, he was an incomparable strategist who exploited limits一the rules, forms, and conventions that he inherited from predecessors such as Haydn and Mozart, Handel and Bach-in strikingly original ways.

The author regards the idea that all highly creative artistic activity transcends limits with

正确答案: A 耗时:
该题平均耗时:4分20秒 ,平均正确率:57 %,难度系数:4 。 该题由网友提供。更多GRE题目请 点击上传

做题笔记

    暂无做题笔记

网友解析

我有更好的解析
  • 当前版本由 嘻嘻嘻嘻嘻嘻呵呵 更新于2019-07-11 14:50:07 感谢由 嘻嘻嘻嘻嘻嘻呵呵 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

     此题有点难定位,不过,文章中的中心思想是说艺术的创新是拓宽和挖掘以前的原则和限制。“This is not to deny that a highly creative artist sometimes establishes a new principle of organization in the history of an artistic field” 这句话明确表达了作者的观点,一个创新的艺术家时常会建立一个新的组织形式在艺术的历史长河里。A选项深刻的怀疑; B 强烈的仇视;C 明显的不同;D 适度的娱乐;E尖刻的嘲讽; 很明显只能选A,C为迷惑选项,但是,不同不能说明什么。 (C是明显的冷漠) C是中立 选项解释: A.深表怀疑 【正确选项,作者不认为科学和艺术是一回事并且举例说明】 B.十分不满,义愤填膺 【反,但带有作者个人情绪,本文中作者并未抨击,只是持反对意见】 C.明显的无所谓 【显然是一种中立的态度】 D.适度的兴趣(即有点兴趣) 【正向评价,不选】 E. 尖锐的嘲笑 【与B选项同理,作者只是不同意,但并没有嘲笑】

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

230921jxkz

However, the idea that extraordinary creativity transcends established limits is misleading when it is applied to the arts 表示sharp derision还是 deep skeptism?
0 0 回复
2024-01-28 15:55:45

454117tidt

wtf
0 0 回复
2023-07-17 17:19:35

Tianiuer

this is not todeny深表怀疑
0 0 回复
2021-02-10 20:00:03

Amaketh

定位 L40but few listeners or musicologists would include these among the great works of music 并不是一种十分强烈的负评价的感觉,所以 marked indifference 最合适。


0 0 回复
2019-07-11 14:49:25

嘻嘻嘻嘻嘻嘻呵呵

此题有点难定位,不过,文章中的中心思想是说艺术的创新是拓宽和挖掘以前的原则和限制。“This is not to deny that a highly creative artist sometimes establishes a new principle of organization in the history of an artistic field” 这句话明确表达了作者的观点,一个创新的艺术家时常会建立一个新的组织形式在艺术的历史长河里。A选项深刻的怀疑; B 强烈的仇视;C 明显的不同;D 适度的娱乐;E尖刻的嘲讽; 很明显只能选A,C为迷惑选项,但是,不同不能说明什么。 (C是明显的冷漠) C是中立 选项解释: A.深表怀疑 【正确选项,作者不认为科学和艺术是一回事并且举例说明】 B.十分不满,义愤填膺 【反,但带有作者个人情绪,本文中作者并未抨击,只是持反对意见】 C.明显的无所谓 【显然是一种中立的态度】 D.适度的兴趣(即有点兴趣) 【正向评价,不选】 E. 尖锐的嘲笑 【与B选项同理,作者只是不同意,但并没有嘲笑】
0 0 回复
2019-07-11 14:48:03
  • <
  • 1
  • 2
最新题目讨论
近期活动

雷哥网GRE微信

微信公众号:greonline
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
GRE培训

高效冲分,预见你想象的目标分!

免责声明 雷哥网GRE(gre.viplgw.cn),GRE培训|GRE考试|GRE在线课程|GRE网课|GRE机经经典题_雷哥网GRE培训官网。本网站提供的OG&150经典题内容,其版权均为ETS所有,Please reference the OG。本网站中所提供的magoosh、Kaplan、princeton、NO、CQ、CHP、猴哥等题目内容来源互联网网友,仅供学习者交流免费使用。

本网站所提供的知识库内容,部分来源于雷哥网GRE整理发布,版权归gre.viplgw.cn所有,部分来源于互联网,版权归原作者所有,本网站内容仅供学习者交流免费使用。

1.使用雷哥网GRE的时间?

刚刚使用 一周之前 半个月前 一个月前 我是老用户

2.通过何种渠道了解到雷哥网GRE?

浏览器搜索 公众号/小红书/知乎/微博等平台 朋友推荐 资讯/题目等链接 其他

3.使用雷哥GRE的用途?(可多选)

其他

4.使用雷哥网GRE曾遇到的问题?(可多选)

其他

5.你对雷哥网GRE的优化建议(可多选)

其他

6.向朋友推荐雷哥网GRE的可能性?

不会

不一定

可能

很可能

一定

提交