Which of the following, if true, helps explain the apparent paradox in the statement above?答案解析-雷哥GRE

雷哥网GRE > 阅读&逻辑 > 150题 > 2890

150题 -2890【medium】 00:00:00 关闭计时

纠错

Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for catering establishments are more stringent than those for ordinary restaurants, more of the cases of food poisoning reported to the city health department were brought on by banquets served by catering services than were brought on by restaurant meals.

第1 题

Which of the following, if true, helps explain the apparent paradox in the statement above?

(A) A significantly larger number of people eat in restaurants than attend catered banquets in any given time period. (B) Catering establishments know how many people they expect to serve, and therefore are less likely than restaurants to have, and serve, leftover food, a major source of food poisoning. (C) Many restaurants provide catering services for banquets in addition to serving individual meals. (D) The number of reported food-poisoning cases at catered banquets is unrelated to whether the meal is served on the caterer's or the client's premises. (E) People are unlikely to make a connection between a meal they have eaten and a subsequent illness unless the illness strikes a group who are in communication with one another.

正确答案： E 耗时：

该题平均耗时：2分59秒，平均正确率：48 %，难度系数：4 。该题由网友admin提供。更多GRE题目请点击上传

做题笔记

暂无做题笔记

网友解析

我有更好的解析

暂无网友解析

1V1 预约名师一对一题目解析课程

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

365585lgh

题中说，尽管catering监管更严格，但是报道了更多catering的food poisoning。E的意思就是大家在catering的时候聚集在一起，然后一些illness更容易在这时候传播。（跟文中的非监管因素符合）。

0 回复

2022-11-02 16:25:53

是你的Eva呀

A. larger number of people eat in restaurants than catered banquets 普通饭店就餐人员更多。与我们想要的解释恰好相反。错误。 B. Catering establishments are less likely than restaurants to have , and serve , leftover food , a major source of food poisoning . 酒席供应商更不可能提供过期食物。与题目悖论相反。 C. Many restaurants provide catering services for banquets in addition to serving individual meals .很多普通饭店也提供酒席。与悖论无关。我们要研究的是“卫生部通报的食物中毒案件更多来源于酒席承办商”。饭店也做酒席承办，但他并不是我们要研究的对象。 D. The number of reported food - poisoning cases at catered banquets is unrelated to whether the meal is served on the caterer's or the client's premises .酒席上食物中毒案数量与酒席是在供应商的地点办的还是在顾客的地点办的没有关系。废话，根本没有解释为什么酒席上多发食物中毒案。 E. People are unlikely to make a connection between a meal they have eaten and a subsequent illness unless the illness strikes a group who are in communication with one another . 一眼看过去很不对，跟“食客”有什么关系？但是仔细看一下，“人们很难把吃的餐和疾病联系起来，除非这个餐食导致了一群相互认识的人共同生病。” 细想，其实说的就是普通饭店和酒席供应的区别。

0 回复

2022-07-04 17:12:06

998355yfpj

逻辑单题有时候正向推逻辑很难选出答案，但也可以用问号排除法解题，排除掉绝对不可能的。 A，普通餐厅人数多，无关。B，宴会没剩饭，削弱结论，逻辑错误。C，普通餐厅也提供宴会服务，与是不是宴会中毒率高无关，因为服务人数多不代表中毒高。D，中毒人数与。。无关，加量信息，与全文讨论的无关。E，它的逻辑不太能理解，但前面都排除了所以选E。

0 回复

2021-06-20 11:04:03

345109qc

如果是 C的情况，报案率，restaurant 至少和catering 一样才对

0 回复

2021-03-01 12:18:27

209010p

搬新东方本题目的是解释一个paradox，对备办酒宴机构的卫生检查严格，反而食品中毒案多，why?(A)、(B)导致的结果应是ordinary restaurant的中毒案多，显然与上述目的不符。(D)所涉及内容与本题目的无关。关键在于(C)，许多人认为(C)正确，而这里应用(C)结论验证我们的收敛思维原则。(C)字面意思仅仅是有些餐厅既提供酒宴服务又提供个人饮食，仅此而已，而选择(C)的读者在此发挥联想：“既然同时提供这两者，就可能怎么样怎么样了”，所以解释了上述paradox，这样做是不对的。GRE的选择必须坚持其字面意思是否达到问题目的，任何递进性的推理都是站不住脚的，所以(C)不对。(E)指出ordinary restaurant的服务对象与catering establishment的服务对象不同，前者是individual meal，后者为group meal，若一个人吃一顿饭后病了，他无法在这顿饭与疾病之间建立联系，因为他不清楚到底是哪一顿饭，但banquet中的人就不一样，如果参加宴会的人大都病了，并且相互知道，那么大家可能建立起这种联系，造成备办酒宴的机构上诉食品中毒案比普通餐厅多，(E)is correct。

0 回复

2020-10-16 16:10:28

做题笔记

网友解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：

关于GRE

关于课程

联系我们