The example of Winston Churchill siding with Joseph Stalin best serves to undermine which of the following views?答案解析-雷哥GRE

雷哥网GRE > 阅读&逻辑 > Magoosh > 4336

Magoosh -4336【medium】 00:00:00 关闭计时

纠错

Even today, the meaning of World War II remains elusive. Beevor, in his latest book, calls it "the greatest man-made disaster in history." That description is very plausible; less so is his idea that it was part of an international civil war between left and right. In 1941 the veteran anti-?Communist Winston Churchill allied himself with Joseph Stalin, frustrating the efforts of the Nazis to turn the war into an anti-?Bolshevik crusade. Nor were the Japanese much concerned that President Roosevelt was (relatively speaking) a man of the left; they attacked Pearl Harbor because of American threats to their interests, not to their ideology. On the other hand, ideological slogans could be strong motivators. Men clung to the idea of fighting for the Führer, or for the emperor, to keep them going in the face of certain defeat. Russians, for their part, were encouraged to fight for the motherland, rather than for the ideals of international socialism, in what was labeled the Great Patriotic War.

The example of Winston Churchill siding with Joseph Stalin best serves to undermine which of the following views?

Soldiers involved in World War II were motivated to fight for their leaders. Beevor’s thesis was not entirely plausible. Any sweeping interpretation of World War II tends to elude historians. The war was mostly fought along ideological lines. The Japanese were less influenced by ideology than Beevor claims.

正确答案： D 耗时：

该题平均耗时：2分46秒，平均正确率：48 %，难度系数：4 。该题由网友提供。更多GRE题目请点击上传

做题笔记

网友解析

我有更好的解析

预约名师一对一题目解析课程

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

发表讨论

哈士奇和鸡阿姨

less so is his idea that it was part of an international civil war between left and right 这么说来，那么b不是也对吗，虽然d在后面有体现

2楼 | 2020-08-27 17:22:37 回复

1174811ery 回复 1174811ery 但关于丘吉尔和斯大林站边的这个事件来说，最直接打击到的是Beevor所说的WWII是一场国际上的左右翼内战这个论点。我理解的另一个不选B的原因是，B这个论点可以由很多不同的论据来反驳，而丘吉尔和斯大林这个可能不是【最】能够破坏它整体的例子。D是因为选项本身说的这场战争就是为了不同边的观念和思想而战，那么题干中思想完全不同的丘吉尔和斯大林都合作了，风马牛不相及的两个意识形态都可以短暂的被放下，由此可以很深刻的表示第二次世界大战跟各派的政治意识形态无关了。

2020-09-18 22:00:58 回复
1174811ery 回复 1174811ery 但关于丘吉尔和斯大林站边的这个事件来说，最直接打击到的是Beevor所说的WWII是一场国际上的左右翼内战这个论点。我理解的另一个不选B的原因是，B这个论点可以由很多不同的论据来反驳，而丘吉尔和斯大林这个可能不是【最】能够破坏它整体的例子。D是因为选项本身说的这场战争就是为了不同边的观念和思想而战，那么题干中思想完全不同的丘吉尔和斯大林都合作了，风马牛不相及的两个意识形态都可以短暂的被放下，由此可以很深刻的表示第二次世界大战跟各派的政治意识形态无关了。

2020-09-18 22:00:58 回复
451622dj 回复 451622dj 题目问的是undermine wich 就是削弱了下面哪个选项但是b选项本身已经是说beevor的观点不可信相当于双重否定了吧我感觉是这样

2022-09-01 03:09:21 回复
467507ahj 回复 467507ahj 我也，看错题了哈哈哈，题目问的是【削弱】哪个选项，我觉得文章在【支持】B居然选了B？？？OMG

2022-10-04 01:23:12 回复

哈士奇和鸡阿姨

not to their ideology 要理解起来太过于费劲

1楼 | 2020-08-27 17:21:06 回复

做题笔记

网友解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：

关于GRE

关于课程

联系我们