According to the rubble-pile hypothesis, an advantage conferred on an asteroid held together by weak forces is that it is答案解析-雷哥GRE

雷哥网GRE > 阅读&逻辑 > Magoosh > 4657

Magoosh -4657【hard】 00:00:00 关闭计时

纠错

Originally, scientists predicted small asteroids to be hard and rocky, as any loose surface material (called regolith) generated by impacts was expected to escape their weak gravity. Aggregate small bodies were not thought to exist, because the slightest sustained relative motion would cause them to separate. But observations and computer modeling are proving otherwise. Most asteroids larger than a kilometer are now believed to be composites of smaller pieces. Those imaged at high-resolution show evidence for copious regolith despite the weak gravity. Most of them have one or more extraordinarily large craters, some of which are wider than the mean radius of the whole body. Such colossal impacts would not just gouge out a crater-they would break any monolithic body into pieces. In short, asteroids larger than a kilometer across may look like nuggets of hard rock but are more likely to be aggregate assemblages-or even piles of loose rubble so pervasively fragmented that no solid bedrock is left. The rubble hypothesis, proposed decades ago by scientists, lacked evidence, until the planetologist Shoemaker realized that the huge craters on the asteroid Mathilde and its very low density could only make sense together: a porous body such as a rubble pile can withstand a battering much better than an integral object. It will absorb and dissipate a large fraction of the energy of an impact; the far side might hardly feel a thing. At first, the rubble hypothesis may appear conceptually troublesome. The material strength of an asteroid is nearly zero, and the gravity is so low one is tempted to neglect that too. The truth is neither strength nor gravity can be ignored. Paltry though it may be, gravity binds a rubble pile together. And anybody who builds sandcastles knows that even loose debris can cohere. Oft-ignored details of motion begin to matter: sliding friction, chemical bonding, damping of kinetic energy, etc. We are just beginning to fathom the subtle interplay of these minuscule forces. The size of an asteroid should determine which force dominates. One indication is the observed pattern of asteroidal rotation rates. Some collisions cause an asteroid to spin faster; others slow it down. If asteroids are monolithic rocks undergoing random collisions, a graph of their rotation rates should show a bell-shaped distribution with a statistical "tail" of very fast rotators. If nearly all asteroids are rubble piles, however, this tail would be missing, because any rubble pile spinning faster than once every two or three hours would fly apart. Recently, several astronomers discovered that all but five observed asteroids obey a strict rotation limit. The exceptions are all smaller than about 150 meters in diameter, with an abrupt cutoff for asteroids larger than 200 meters. The evident conclusion-that asteroids larger than 200 meters across are rubble piles-agrees with recent computer modeling of collisions. A collision can blast a large asteroid to bits, but those bits will usually be moving slower than their mutual escape velocity (the lowest velocity that a body must have in order to escape the orbit of a planet). Over several hours, gravity will reassemble all but the fastest pieces into a rubble pile.

According to the rubble-pile hypothesis, an advantage conferred on an asteroid held together by weak forces is that it is

unlikely to fall apart over a long period of time more amenable to computer modeling less susceptible to powerful impacts not likely to collide with another object more readily observed by astronomers

正确答案： C 耗时：

该题平均耗时：2分37秒，平均正确率：48 %，难度系数：4 。该题由网友提供。更多GRE题目请点击上传

做题笔记

暂无做题笔记

网友解析

我有更好的解析

暂无网友解析

1V1 预约名师一对一题目解析课程

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

摩卡

关于rubble hypothesis在原文中的完整表述：the rubble hypothesis, proposed decades ago by scientists, lacked evidence, until the planetologist Shoemker realized that the huge craters on the asteroid Mathilde and its very low density could only make sense together: a porous body such as rubble pile can withstand a battering much better than an integral object.所以，题目中weak force 带给asteroid 优势就是can withstand a battering much better than an integral object.=C. less susceptible to powerful impacts

0 回复

2021-10-22 15:01:23

做题笔记

网友解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：

关于GRE

关于课程

联系我们