The passage provides information to support which of the following statements about the historians discussed in the passage EXCEPT 答案解析-雷哥GRE

雷哥网GRE > 阅读&逻辑 > CHP36套 > 4816

CHP36套 -4816【hard】 00:00:00 关闭计时

纠错

Influenced by the view of some twentieth-century feminists that women's position within the family is one of the central factors determining women's social position, some historians have underestimated the significance of the woman suffrage movement. These historians contend that nineteenth-century suffragism was less radical and, hence, less important than, for example, the moral reform movement or domestic feminism—two nineteenth-century movements in which women struggled for more power and autonomy within the family. True, by emphasizing these struggles, such historians have broadened the conventional view of nineteenth-century feminism, but they do a historical disservice to suffragism. Nineteenth-century feminists and anti-feminist alike perceived the suffragists' demand for enfranchisement as the most radical element in women's protest, in part because suffragists were demanding power that was not based on the institution of the family, women's traditional sphere. When evaluating nineteenth-century feminism as a social force, contemporary historians should consider the perceptions of actual participants in the historical events.

The passage provides information to support which of the following statements about the historians discussed in the passage EXCEPT

They rely too greatly on the perceptions of the actual participants in the events they study. Their assessment of the significance of nineteenthcentury suffragism differs considerably from that of nineteenth-century feminists. They devote too much attention to nineteenthcentury suffragism at the expense of more radical movements that emerged shortly after the turn of the century.

正确答案： AC 耗时：

该题平均耗时：2分6秒，平均正确率：42 %，难度系数：5 。该题由网友lgw19070提供。更多GRE题目请点击上传

做题笔记

暂无做题笔记

网友解析

我有更好的解析

当前版本由雷哥GMAT团队更新于2018-05-10 14:41:51 感谢由雷哥GMAT团队对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

家庭是女生社会地位的最主要因素，历史学家认为 suffragism 不如 feminism 深刻
重要，因为 suffragism 没有怎么涉及家庭这个观念；事实上，历史学家们扩大了传
统观点的对 feminism 影响作用，无论 feminism 和 anti-feminism 都认为，
suffragism 争取的权利是女权斗争中最厉害的最难以争取的，他们与传统的家庭观
念无关，所以历史学家们单单依靠他们没有涉及家庭这个原因否定 suffragism 是不
正确的。