搜索图标
搜索

热门搜索:如何备考GRE GRE填空 GRE数学机经 GRE模考

Magoosh -4950【medium】 00:00:00 关闭计时
收藏
纠错

To describe a style as Faulknerian or Beckettian or Nabakovian conjures up a host of literary moods, dispositions, and temperaments that coalesce to form an imprint as distinctive as a genetic code. This imprint, a trace-code of the authorial DNA, is our primary way of distinguishing the focused person who writes from that"bundle of accidents and incoherence that sits down at breakfast,"as Yeats somewhat comically described the writer of prose.   Yet however expert we become in deciphering the authorial code, we can never know the person who writes directly through her writing. This is an odder claim than it may initially appear, when you consider that the writer may divulge the most intimate secrets of her inner life through the very things she chooses to write about and by the way she writes about them. I want to make an even odder claim and insist that the person who writes never appears to us except as a figment of our imagination.   So this is what I am conveying in the case of Virginia Woolf, when I say I am"imagining"Virginia Woolf. I do not mean by this that I am making her up or attributing qualities to her that she may not indeed possess. Quite the opposite. It is Woolf who makes things up, who makes herself up-that is what it means, at a very fundamental level, to have an imagination and to use it in your writing. What I fabricate is an image of her that has slowly formed in my mind-a figment I call it-from the impressions, some more concrete than others, that I collect as I am reading her. This figment of the author may coexist with, but should never be mistaken for, the "figure of the author." I suspect it matters little to most readers whether the author as a literary figure is dead or alive or temporarily missing in action. On the other hand, the figment, being a subjective creation and not a rhetorical or literary personification, has a different reality and possesses a different importance in the mind of the reader. The figment of the author that attends us in our reading tends to be evanescent, but is never insubstantial in its impact upon us.   It was Woolf who alerted me to the inevitability of these figments, of their power to shadow and ultimately affect our intellectual and emotional relation to what we are reading. The first concrete piece of advice she gives the reader in "How Should One Read a Book?"is to try to become the author, but then, in a reversal that becomes more and more typical of her as she becomes confident in her own opinions that she can afford to qualify and, when necessary, disregard, she admits her inability to follow her own advice.

The primary purpose of the passage is to

正确答案: C 耗时:
该题平均耗时:1分37秒 ,平均正确率:28 %,难度系数:5 。 该题由网友提供。更多GRE题目请 点击上传

做题笔记

网友解析

我有更好的解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

171044f

D错在不一定有incongruity, 对应原文 This figment of the author may coexist with, but should never be mistaken for, the "figure of the author."
2楼  | 2021-09-19 22:16:02 回复

哈士奇和鸡阿姨

I want to make an even odder claim and insist that the person who writes never appears to us except as a figment of our imagination.  意思是读者都是通过figment和作者有interface的? 为什么我老觉得d选项更符合呢?我们不能通过作者写的东西来真正里了解这个作者,那不就是incongruity between the writer and the reader's perception of that writer吗??!
1楼  | 2020-08-23 18:02:16 回复
最新更新题库
雷哥网GRE微信

微信公众号:greonline

报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
GRE培训

高效冲分,预见你想象的目标分!

免责声明 雷哥网GRE(gre.viplgw.cn),GRE培训|GRE考试|GRE在线课程|GRE网课|GRE机经经典题_雷哥网GRE培训官网。本网站提供的OG&150经典题内容,其版权均为ETS所有,Please reference the OG。本网站中所提供的magoosh、Kaplan、princeton、NO、CQ、CHP、猴哥等题目内容来源互联网网友,仅供学习者交流免费使用。

本网站所提供的知识库内容,部分来源于雷哥网GRE整理发布,版权归gre.viplgw.cn所有,部分来源于互联网,版权归原作者所有,本网站内容仅供学习者交流免费使用。

1.使用雷哥网GRE的时间?

刚刚使用 一周之前 半个月前 一个月前 我是老用户

2.通过何种渠道了解到雷哥网GRE?

浏览器搜索 公众号/小红书/知乎/微博等平台 朋友推荐 资讯/题目等链接 其他

3.使用雷哥GRE的用途?(可多选)

其他

4.使用雷哥网GRE曾遇到的问题?(可多选)

其他

5.你对雷哥网GRE的优化建议(可多选)

其他

6.向朋友推荐雷哥网GRE的可能性?

不会

不一定

可能

很可能

一定

提交