搜索图标
搜索

热门搜索:如何备考GRE GRE填空 GRE数学机经 GRE模考

冲分救命题 -6626【medium】 00:00:00 关闭计时
收藏
纠错

The age at which young children begin to make moral discriminations about harmful actions committed against themselves or others has been the focus of recent research into the moral development of children. Until recently, child psychologists supported pioneer developmentalist Jean. Piaget in his hypothesis that because of their immaturity, children under age seven do not take into account the intentions of a person committing accidental or deliberate harm, but rather simply assign punishment for transgressions on the basis of the magnitude of the negative consequences caused. According to Piaget, children under age seven occupy the first stage of moral development, which is characterized by moral absolutism (rules made by authorities must be obeyed) and imminent justice (if rules are broken, punishment will be meted (to give out by measure: DOLE usually used with out “mete out punishment”) out). Until young children mature, their moral judgments are based entirely on the effect rather than the cause of a transgression. However, in recent research, Keasey found that six-year-old children not only distinguish between accidental and intentional harm, but also judge intentional harm as naughtier, regardless of the amount of damage produced. Both of these findings seem to indicate that children, at an earlier age than Piaget claimed, advance into the second stage of moral development, moral autonomy, in which they accept social rules but view them as more arbitrary than do children in the first stage.

Keasey’s research raises two key questions for developmental psychologists about children under age seven: do they recognize justifications for harmful actions, and do they make distinctions between harmful acts that are preventable and those acts that have unforeseen harmful consequences? Studies indicate that justifications excusing harmful actions might include public duty, self-defense, and provocation. For example, Nesdale and Rule concluded that children were capable of considering whether or not an aggressor’s action was justified by public duty: five year olds reacted very differently to “Bonnie wrecks Ann’s pretend house” depending on whether Bonnie did it “so somebody won’t fall over it” or because Bonnie wanted “to make Ann feel bad.” Thus, a child of five begins to understand that certain harmful actions, though intentional, can be justified; the constraints of moral absolutism no longer solely guide their judgments.

Psychologists have determined that during kindergarten children learn to make subtle distinctions involving harm. Darley observed that among acts involving unintentional harm, six-year-old children just entering kindergarten could not differentiate between foreseeable, and thus preventable, harm and unforeseeable harm for which the perpetrator cannot be blamed. Seven months later, however, Darley found that these same children could make both distinctions, thus demonstrating that they had become morally autonomous.

According to the passage, Keasey’s findings support which of the following conclusions about six-year-old children?

正确答案: A 耗时:
该题平均耗时:1分18秒 ,平均正确率:81 %,难度系数:2 。 该题由网友提供。更多GRE题目请 点击上传

做题笔记

网友解析

我有更好的解析
  • 当前版本由长颈鹿在哪里呀更新于2019-03-18 22:57:37 感谢由长颈鹿在哪里呀对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

    这道题问的Keasey的观点,Keasey found that six-year-old children not only distinguish between accidental and intentional harm, but also judge intentional harm as naughtier, regardless of the amount of damage produced. 从这句话以及下一段的论述,可以看出Keasey是认为孩子有一定的道德分辨能力的。其他的选项与文中内容不符。​

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

樱花桑塔纳

为什么不能根据第一段的最后一句Both of these findings seem to indicate that children, at an earlier age than Piaget claimed, advance into the second stage of moral development, moral autonomy, in which they accept social rules but view them as more arbitrary than do children in the first stage。选e呢?
1楼  | 2021-05-01 19:02:20 回复
最新更新题库
雷哥网GRE微信

微信公众号:greonline

报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
GRE培训

高效提分,预见你想象的高分!

2020 gre.viplgw.cn All Rights Reserved 川公网安备 51010402001157号 蜀ICP备20012245号-5 免责声明
雷哥网GRE(gre.viplgw.cn),GRE培训|GRE考试|GRE在线课程|GRE网课|GRE机经真题_雷哥网GRE培训官网。本网站提供的OG&150真题&真题内容,其版权均为ETS所有,Please reference the OG。本网站中所提供的magoosh、Kaplan、princeton、NO、CQ、CHP、猴哥等题目内容来源互联网网友,仅供学习者交流免费使用。本网站所提供的知识库内容,部分来源于雷哥网GRE整理发布,版权归gre.viplgw.cn所有,部分来源于互联网,版权归原作者所有,本网站内容仅供学习者交流免费使用。