搜索图标
搜索

热门搜索:如何备考GRE GRE填空 GRE数学机经 GRE模考

【新版】冲分救命题 -11784【medium】 00:00:00 关闭计时
收藏
纠错

Medieval authors continually reworked their own manuscripts,proving a variety of competing texts during their own lifetimes.Later editors often merged,reorganized,supplemented,or suppressed, parts of these manuscripts when they were having them copied by hes,who were themselves sometimes unreliable. Thus,the proper ordering of tales within The Canterbury Tales and the proper sequential reconstruction of the framing narrative that surrounds them remain topics of dispute in Chaucer studies. In recent years,the usefulness of the Ellesmere manuscript as a guide to Chaucer' s own intentions has been severely criticized, especially in relation to another,very early (though incomplete) manuscript, Hengwrt. In asserting that Hengwrt is closer to Chaucer's original than Ellesmere is,scholars deploy a number of arguments:that the text of some of the Tales is more comprehensible in Hengwrt than in Ellesmere,that although both manuscripts were written within a decade after Chaucer's death,Hengwrt is,by paleographic means,demonstrably the earlier,that the very fact that Hengwrt presents the Tales in a jumbled sequence more accurately reflects the probably chaotic state of Chaucer's papers at the time of his death,and that the same scribe wrote both the Ellesmere and the Hengwrt manuscripts,and since a since was unlikely to undo sensible established sequence,the coherent arrangement of Ellesmere is later and more representative of editorial intervention than authorial intention.

Not all of these assertions can be unequivocally accepted,and even those that can be serve as much to support as to undermine theauthonity of Ellesmere's presentation of the Tales. The chronological priority of Hengwrt,for example,is by no means certain:some expert paleographers find themselves unable to pronounce on the question .And even if one were to accept the outmoded assumption that the medieval manuscript created earliest is automatically the least “corrupt", and could demonstrate that Hengwrt was earlier, its chronological priority would prove little. Ellesmere could,after all,have been a copy of an even earlier manuscript,one unrelated to Hengwrt but now lost to us. Nor is it certain that Hengwrt and Ellesmere were written by the same scribe : certain divergences in spelling strongly suggest they were not More importantly,while Ellesmere certainly docs present the Tales in a more artistic and satisfying sequence than does Hengwrt,this handy proves that the jumbled ordering of Hengwrt is closer ether to what was available after Chaucer's death or to his intention If Chaucer left so finished manuscript of the Tales, Hengwrt too is the product of editorial intervention : someone gathered the materials for it and put them in a set order for a scribe to copy Editors cannot put such posthumous materials together without making some hypothesis about authorial intentions,the accuracy of such by hypothesis has always depended on the information available to then and on the intelligence with which they used it.

The author of the passage attributes the ongoing dispute in Chaucer scholarship regarding the sequencing of The Canterbury Tales to the fact that

正确答案: E 耗时:
该题平均耗时:1分43秒 ,平均正确率:22 %,难度系数:3 。 该题由网友提供。更多GRE题目请 点击上传

做题笔记

    暂无做题笔记

网友解析

我有更好的解析

    暂无网友解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

297567tjeg

选C不行吗
0 0 回复
2024-11-23 09:19:51

296277ihukp

Author认为引起争议的原因(其实第一句话就是,author和editor的版本太多) 选E
0 0 回复
2024-09-25 10:02:07

342500ezj

天杀的这破题是我能做出来的吗?
0 0 回复
2024-09-14 14:43:23

Drshiyu

气死我了怎么没人骂这道题啊啊啊连错四道哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈我精神状态挺好的呀啊啊啊啊每次都觉得E最离谱结果三道都选E啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊虽说好事多磨但我看GRE是把我当驴了
1 0 回复
2024-08-04 12:51:30

191502vzk

為何不是A?E ”both before and after their authors death" 不是只有after the authors pass for a decade 嗎?
0 0 回复
2024-05-23 17:51:18
  • 284353wdhjm 回复 284353wdhjm

    A的分析: 古文字學證據關於手稿年代的證據充其量是模糊的,專家古文字學家經常意見不一致。 文章確實提到關於手稿年代的爭議,但這只是問題的一部分。文章並沒有強調這是持續爭議的主要原因。 E的分析: 中世紀文學作品的截然不同版本在作者生前和死後同時流通。 文章明確提到中世紀作者經常重新編寫自己的手稿,並且在作者生前和死後存在不同版本的情況。這使得確定正確的順序變得困難,因為有多種競爭文本同時存在。可以locate 到原文: Medieval authors continually reworked their own manuscripts,proving a variety of competing texts during their own lifetimes.Later editors often merged,reorganized,supplemented,or suppressed, parts of these manuscripts when they were having them copied by hes,who were themselves sometimes unreliable. Thus,the proper ordering of tales within The Canterbury Tales and the proper sequential reconstruction of the framing narrative that surrounds them remain topics of dispute in Chaucer studies.

    0 0 回复
    2024-06-06 07:18:30
最新题目讨论
近期活动

雷哥网GRE微信

微信公众号:greonline
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
GRE培训

高效冲分,预见你想象的目标分!

免责声明 雷哥网GRE(gre.viplgw.cn),GRE培训|GRE考试|GRE在线课程|GRE网课|GRE机经经典题_雷哥网GRE培训官网。本网站提供的OG&150经典题内容,其版权均为ETS所有,Please reference the OG。本网站中所提供的magoosh、Kaplan、princeton、NO、CQ、CHP、猴哥等题目内容来源互联网网友,仅供学习者交流免费使用。

本网站所提供的知识库内容,部分来源于雷哥网GRE整理发布,版权归gre.viplgw.cn所有,部分来源于互联网,版权归原作者所有,本网站内容仅供学习者交流免费使用。

1.使用雷哥网GRE的时间?

刚刚使用 一周之前 半个月前 一个月前 我是老用户

2.通过何种渠道了解到雷哥网GRE?

浏览器搜索 公众号/小红书/知乎/微博等平台 朋友推荐 资讯/题目等链接 其他

3.使用雷哥GRE的用途?(可多选)

其他

4.使用雷哥网GRE曾遇到的问题?(可多选)

其他

5.你对雷哥网GRE的优化建议(可多选)

其他

6.向朋友推荐雷哥网GRE的可能性?

不会

不一定

可能

很可能

一定

提交